Wanna!!! Know the Reasons why the National Sports Bill 2011 was rejected by Government of India
National Sports Bill 2011 Bill or law is good law proposed by Ajay Makan. The Union Cabinet rejected Mr Maken's new Sports Bill.
Ajay Makan is the sports Minister of India.
Ajay Makan needs the public support Please support Ajay Makan so he can make a good bill into a law.
It will bring accountability and transparency in sports. It will bring all sports organizations under Right to information act.
Most Important proposal in this law is the age.
Under this law BCCI will come under the Right to Information law.
This will allow every Indian to know about financial transactions of the BCCI.
Remember BCCI gets tax exemptions from Government of India.
Remember they use police service and they get land for the cricket grounds from the Government of India.
Thus they should come under right to information law.
T20 tournament – the Indian Premier League (IPL). The IPL is currently being investigated by multiple agencies and a parliamentary committee for tax evasion and foreign exchange violations.
Every Indian citizen has a right to know from where money is coming into IPL.
The another provision of this bill say that who head sports federations must not be older than 70.
I think 70 is too much 60 is perfect no one above the age of 60 should head the sports federations.
Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar, Union Minister for New and Renewable Energy Farooq Abdullah, Congress minister of state Rajiv Shukla all are also leaders of sports bodies.
1. Sharad Pawar is the president of the ICC,
2. Farooq Abdullah is president of the Jammu and Kashmir Cricket Association
3. Rajeev Shukla is a BCCI vice-president.
Sharad Pawar is 71 years old
Farooq Abdullah is 73 years old
Vilasrao Deshmukh is 66 years old.
Now I hope you got the idea why the National Sports Bill was rejected by Indian government.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteam penitential to say that I dissent with your impression that the age limit should be "60". I mean why should the retirement age not be 65 or 75? Are people above that age incompetent?
ReplyDeleteIn point of fact, there are many successful people in different fields who are above 70.
And, believe me the names you mentioned are all above 60, and they are very clever politicians, that's why they are there.
Also, Mr. Sharad Pawar (71) is the President of ICC and he is above "60". And, I can name you several people worldwide who have held such top positions in cricket, soccer,etc.
I totally agree with u Ahmad....why should a person step down of what he or she is doing just bcoz of his or her age???there should be some specific and vital reasons for there removal.....to some extent age does affect the efficiency of an individual but this could not be the case for every individual...
ReplyDelete